admin

 

Organizational change initiatives need active change leadership. While they also need strong engagement from all levels of the organization, several studies have indicated that absence of vigorous change leadership, often called sponsorship, is one of the prime causes of the failure of change initiatives.

Often, the problem is that while there is named sponsor, the named individual is quite busy and relies on staff to do the work of putting the organizational change into practice. But lack of involvement by the sponsor seriously weakens the influence of the change initiative, because employees need to see active management support and commitment for the change to believe the change going to remain in place. Otherwise, they will assume that the commitments and reaction that they are used to are still in place.

So, being a strong change leader is more than being a name in a box. It involves the skillful application of leadership skills, some of which are summarized below.

1. Create a simple, compelling vision. Frame the change in terms of results for the organization as a whole as well as the effect on the individual.

2. Reinforce the need for change. Take steps to help people understand what is required and why. Clearly and consistently remind people that transformation is required in order to gain a competitive advantage.

3. Challenge others to get on board with the change. Interact with individuals and groups in the organization to explain the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the change.

4. Utilize every opportunity to interact with others. Encourage challenges and answer questions.

5. Confront colleagues when they are not supporting the change. Keep colleagues honest by connecting back to group decisions

6. Face up to people’s expressions of negativity. Allow people to express concerns and to discuss them. Avoid stamping out issues. Instead, “exhaust them out”  by listening and discussing.

7. Mediate strong conflict among key people in the organizations.

8. Allow people at lower levels in the organization freedom to discover their own way to align with the new direction. Foster and create an atmosphere that enables people to test the new change, generate recommendations, experiment with new ways of operating, and exhibit some dysfunctional behavior while the change is taking root in the culture.

9. Create and sustain energy for transformation—keep the focus on the change and make sure sufficient resources are available. Change consultant Robert Miles says, “resistance to change builds in direct proportion to the perceived lack of resources.”

10. Take a total system perspective. Organizations are complex systems where transformational change requires changing many interrelated parts at once.

11. Use a systematic implementation process. Ad hoc processes like brainstorming recommendations and assigning people do execute the recommendations rarely result in transformational change. Robust change methodologies that are grounded on solid principles of organizational behavior often seem counterintuitive or overly difficult, but they mediate the strong emotions and seemingly commonsense objections that actually subvert the change.

12. Display a constant dedication to making change a reality. Focus on results, success, analyzing failure to determine why it occurred, and constantly encouraging others to try again.

 

“Philosophy” is word you don’t hear all that often in the business world. So, a few days ago, when I was asked to consult a project team that wanted to improve the client’s experience of the IT department, I was intrigued when the project manager said, “We want to create a philosophy of paying attention to what the client wants.”

Few people would dispute that paying attention to the client is a good thing. The problem is how we get there. By philosophy, it is probably safe to say that the project manager in this example was talking about the values, beliefs, and assumptions of IT employees. He was using the word “philosophy” to discuss what is often called “organizational culture.” But we cannot really change a person’s values and beliefs. More importantly, planning change activities as though we can leads to ineffective approaches.

Only an individual can change his or her beliefs, values, and assumptions. Although some core beliefs and values may remain fairly stable, others shift as we experience life. The beliefs that we have are based on a lifetime of experience lived in certain societies, with certain occupations, friends, encounters with managers, and so on.

When we think of beliefs as something that can be altered through a change initiative, the resulting plan is heavy on communications and training. We assume that telling a person to believe differently, especially when that telling is done by upper management, will cause it to be so. But when we understand beliefs as a product of temporal sociocultural experience, our understanding leads to different ideas about change. We start thinking in terms of how to create experiences for others that will lead them to different learning and different decisions about beliefs and values. We do not know exactly what they will change their beliefs and values to, but we can provide the conditions for change and have confidence that the change will be along certain lines.

© 2012 empowerbase.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha